About Me

Name: Employee Free...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Over 300 Homeless People Expected to Participate in Informational Picketing @ Rivers Casino in Pittsburgh

 





Ed Fasulo, President and COO of Rivers Casino



Rivers Casino agrees to contribute $7.5M annually to help fund Consol Energy Center While Paying Its Workers Poverty Wages



Ed Fasulo Explain To Me, Your Customers, Your Workers and the Rest of the Pittsburgh Community on HOW The Workers at RIVERS CASINO Can Afford to Support Their Families on Poverty Wages Ranging From $8.00 to $9.50 Per Hour?



Ed Fasulo Please Be Advised that to Bring awareness to the Poverty Wages being Paid to The Workers of Rivers Casino, the International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America SPFPA along with THE HOMELESS, Community and Religious Groups, Labor Organizations and Politicians is planning to hold Informational Picketing outside of Rivers Casino to EXPOSE the Poverty Wages being paid to its Workers by Rivers Casino .....Coming Soon, The Date to be announced!

Rivers Casino Nets $1.29 million in Eighteen Hours,
Third Highest Opening Day in Pennsylvania History


About the Rivers Casino

The Rivers Casino is a joint venture between Walton Street Capital, High Pitt Gaming and Don Barden. Neil Bluhm, the Founding Principal of Walton Street Capital, has over four decades of experience developing commercial, residential and gaming properties. Greg Carlin, the CEO of High Pitt Gaming, LLC, has over a decade of gaming investment and management experience. Other casino projects owned and managed by Mr. Bluhm and Mr. Carlin include the Fallsview Casino Resort in Ontario, the Riverwalk Casino & Hotel in Vicksburg, MS, and the SugarHouse Casino in Philadelphia.

Related Sites:

Jobs With Justice

International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America SPFPA

USW | United Steelworkers

AFL-CIO

Unite - Here

Service Employee International Union SEIU

Rivers Casino Union Busting Tactics

Rivers Casino Supervisor Physically Assaults Casino Security Officer During Union Campaign

BREAKING NEWS:

PITTSBURGH: Rivers Casino Bets Against Hunger
Posted: 4:20 pm EST November 13, 2009Updated: 4:26 pm EST November 13, 2009



The Rivers Casino on the North Shore is helping out the hungry this holiday season by sponsoring a food drive for the Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank.

Beginning Monday, November 16th casino customers can bring non-perishable food or grocery items and receive $5.00 in free play for each item (limit 3 items, $15.00 per person, per day).

The food drive offer is good for Mondays ONLY through December 21st. Participants will receive their free play through their Riverwatch Player Club Card only. Food donors who don’t have a card can sign up for one at the casino; there is no charge.

Volunteers will be stationed at the front door and at the entrance from the parking garage to assist in the collection of food donations. Donors are reminded not to bring items in glass jars.

Most-needed items include canned meat and fish, peanut butter, holiday-associated items like canned yams; healthy boxed items like low-sugar cereal, rice and pasta; fruit and vegetables or non food items like shampoo, toothpaste, paper goods or cleaning items.


http://www.wpxi.com/news/21609268/detail.html

Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank

Tags: Ed Fasulo, Rivers Casino, Homeless, Poverty Wages, Workers, Pittsburgh Community, SPFPA, Neil Bluhm, Walton Street Capital, High Pitt Gaming, Don Barden, Pittsburgh News, Casino, Labor Union, AFL-CIO, Jobs With Justice,United Steelworkers USW, Unite - Here, SEIU, Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Did Rivers Casino Security Officers vote against unionization or did they Fall Victim to Jackson & Lewis Union-Busting FEAR and Intimidation Tactics?

 




On Monday November 9th Security personnel working at the Rivers Casino voted 38-35 Monday evening to oppose organizing under the International Union for Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America SPFPA.

On the surface as reported by local Pittsburgh newspapers you would think that the majority of casino security professionals making $9.50 per hour working at Rivers Casino in downtown Pittsburgh voted by a very small margin to oppose unionization, however the facts reveal a different picture.



What really took place according to Steve Maritas International Organizing Director for the SPFPA was that 38 casino security professionals and surveillance officers who the Rivers Casino demanded be included in this election to tilt the numbers in favor of them fell victim to Union-Busting FEAR and intimidation tactics outlined in the unfair labor charges filed with the National Labor Relations Board.

If the company Rivers Casino implies or gives the impression that if you vote in favor of unionization the company will possibly takeaway your free meals, parking privileges, your 401k plan, your preferred shift, reduce your wages and other benefits you now enjoy and that unionization will be futile...How would you vote? In favor of Unionization or Against Unionization?

Now add in the fact that the surveillance officers who make much more money are indirectly told that the $9.50 casino security officer can possibly take their jobs away from them if the union is voted in because of seniority rules (as reported by one of the Rivers Casino's surveillance officer to the union) what would you expect them to do?

Martin Jay Levitt, 1993, Confessions of a Union Buster said it best

Union busting is a field populated by bullies and built on deceit. A campaign against a union is an assault on individuals and a war on truth. As such, it is a war without honor. The only way to bust a union is to lie, distort, manipulate, threaten, and always, always attack.




"Rivers Casino Whole Campaign was built on FEAR" Stated Steve Maritas Organizing Director of the International Union, Security Police and Fire Professionals of America SPFPA."

The high priced law firm who was running this Union-Busting FEAR and Intimidation Campaign was the notorious Jackson and Lewis.

Whenever Jackson and Lewis is hired to conduct an anti-union campaign they immediately teach management what to do and say to their employees as in the case of Rivers Casino. One of the most effective Union-Busting tactics is to have your management personal conduct "captive audience meetings," better known as Psychological warfare captive audience meetings.

The United States Joint Chiefs of Staff defined psychological warfare more broadly stating Psychological warfare employs any weapon to influence the mind of the enemy. The weapons are psychological only in the effect they produce and not because of the weapons themselves."

Throughout this campaign Rivers Casino held daily meetings with 2 or 3 casino security professionals at a time feeding them misleading information half-truths and out right lies about unionization while gauging worker sympathies and FEARS to pressure these casino security professionals not to vote yes for the union. In this case 38 of these Rivers Casino officers fell victim to Jackson and Lewis Union-Busting tactics.

In the end based on the unfair labor charges and objections being filed by the union and the closeness of the vote there is no doubt in Steve Maritas' mind that in the end the results of this election will not be certified as predicted by Ed Fasulo, president and COO of Rivers Casino who also stated in a prepared statement that the organization would "continue to respect its employees' right to choose."



Steve Maritas in a rebuttal of Ed Fasulo statement stated "we hope Ed Fasulo honors his word because when this fight is done and over an a new election is ordered the Rivers Casino security professionals will have a second chance to Unionize and in my 30 plus years of organizing I never lost a second election!".

In the interim Maritas stated that "he is planning a series of informational picketing to inform the customers on the Union-Busting tactics used in this campaign by Rivers Casino. In addition he is also enlisting the help of the United Steelworkers USW union who are presently organizing the other departments at Rivers Casino as well as the AFL-CIO, SEIU, Teamsters, UAW and Unite-Here. "Pittsburgh is a Union Town and Rivers Casino will soon find that out. Stated Maritas.

Tags: Rivers Casino, Jackson and Lewis , Steve Maritas,SPFPA,Ed Fasulo, Union-Busting, Union Avoidance, Union Blogs, Casinos, Union Busting Tactics, AFL-CIO, SEIU, USW, Steelworkers, Teamsters, Unite-Here, uaw

Union plans appeal over Rivers Casino vote

Rivers Casino Supervisor Physically Assaults Casino Security Officer during Union Campaign

http://www.unionbusting101.com/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

UNION BUSTING Play Book : Step by Step on What UNION BUSTERS Do and How They Run UNION BUSTING Campaigns.

 

UNION BUSTING Play Book : Step by Step on What UNION BUSTERS Do and How They Run UNION BUSTING Campaigns.

WHAT IS Union Busting?

Union-busting is a practice that is undertaken by an employer or their agents to prevent employees from joining a labor union, or to disempower, subvert, or destroy unions that already exist.



Union busting is a field populated by bullies and built on deceit. A campaign against a union is an assault on individuals and a war on truth. As such, it is a war without honor. The only way to bust a union is to lie, distort, manipulate, threaten, and always, always attack.

Martin Jay Levitt, 1993, Confessions of a Union Buster

The irony of union busters is that management is extremely fearful of “losing control” of the workplace and sharing power with its workforce in the form of a union. Yet they happily hand over control of the workplace to the union busters they hire who do exactly that—directing the entire campaign and in effect taking control of the workplace by telling management and supervisors what to say, what to do and how to act. The money that management squanders on these union busters would be much better spent on dealing with the real workplace issues.

UNION BUSTING PLAY BOOK
Step by Step on What UNION BUSTERS Do and How They Run UNION BUSTING Campaigns.


http://www.unionbusting101.com/

The Union Busting Strategy Against the Employee Free Choice Act ( EFCA )

http://efcanow.blogspot.com/2009/03/is-strategy-behind-efca-national-ads.html

Tags: Union Busting, EFCA, Employee Free Choice Act, Labor Union, AFL-CIO, Union Blogs, Union Avoidance, Union Buster, Union Campaigns, Organizing a union
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sen Specter Tells Democrats I'm going to need you to become Republicans, Republicans at least for a day."

Sen Specter Tells Democrats I'm going to need you to become Republicans, Republicans at least for a day."


Parade of workers lobbies Specter on Employee Free Choice EFCA labor bill

Specter stumping with Congressional Dems

Posted by LAURA VECSEY, Of The Patriot-News April 14, 2009 12:19PM
Categories: Arlen Specter

Sen. Arlen Specter was in Harrisburg this morning to tour Harrisburg Hospital, which is getting $190,000 in federal dollars this year for emergency room expansion. The interesting twist is that Specter appeared with U.S. Rep. Tim Holden (D-Pa) which marks a growing trend for the embattled senior senator that sees him touring Pennsylvania with Democratic congressmen.



U.S. Rep. Tim Holden (D-Pa)

Specter is in full campaign mode. The Washington Post reported that on Monday, Specter "openly encouraged" Democrats to switch back to the Republican party ahead of next year's primary, which will pit Specter against Peg Luksik and, presumably, Pat Toomey.



Specter told some Philadelphia retailers:
"I don't know if there are any Democrats in this room. If there are, I'm going to need you to become Republicans, Republicans at least for a day."


Sen Specter Workers All Across America Need YOU to Become a Democrat at least for a day. Support The Employee Free Choice Act EFCA NOW!

U.S. Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.), head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, wrote a letter asking Republicans to support Specter.

"As I survey the political landscape of the upcoming 2010 elections, it's clear we need more candidates that fit their states," Cornyn wrote. "While I doubt Arlen could win an election in my home state of Texas, I am certain that I could not get elected in Pennsylvania. I believe that Senator Specter is our best bet to keep this Senate seat in the GOP column. A vote for Arlen Specter is a vote for denying Harry Reid and the Democrats a filibuster-proof Senate."


Tags: AFL-CIO, Arlen Specter, Employee Free Choice Act, EFCA, Employee Free Choice,Free Choice Act Specter, Tim Holden, Labor Unions, Unions, Union Blogs, Free Choice, Sphere: Related Content
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stewart Acuff, special assistant to AFL-CIO President John Sweeney touts Employee Free Choice Act : EFCA campaign

 



Photo by Jason Kosena/The Colorado Statesman Stewart Acuff, special assistant to AFL-CIO President John Sweeney and spearhead of the EFCA, told The Colorado Statesman this week that organized labor is ready to work on behalf of lawmakers who “do the right thing” and support the act.

Stewart Acuff, special assistant to AFL-CIO President John Sweeney touts Employee Free Choice Act : EFCA campaign
4/03/2009

By Jason Kosena
THE COLORADO STATESMAN

The heat is on when it comes to the Employee Free Choice Act.

One week after U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue came to Denver to talk to business leaders about the importance of opposing the EFCA, a major labor leader made stops up and down the Front Range to promote the proposed legislation.

Reps. Mike Merrifeld, D-Colorado Springs, Judy Solano, D-Thornton and Rep. Gwyn Green, D-Golden, listen to a presentation by the AFL-CIO.

Acuff said that — unlike Donohue, who publicly promised last week that the business community would go after middle-of-the-road senators such as Colorado’s Michael Bennet if they choose to vote for the EFCA — he isn’t planning to play hardball.

“I will leave it to the business community to bully political leaders in the way they bully their employees,” Acuff said. “We’re not making any threats, as they are. But we are appealing to senators’ common sense and their sense of fairness…. We will fight as hard as we can to protect everyone who makes the right decision about this legislation.”

The EFCA would ease union organization rules and, in theory, clear a path for organized labor to eliminate a secret ballot in elections on whether to unionize. Republicans and business leaders say union bosses will use the open voting process to intimidate voters they know oppose union formation.

Democrats and organized labor disagree, pointing to a provision in the act that would allow for a secret ballot if 30 percent of workers ask for one. Furthermore, they say, it will level the playing field because corporate bosses currently are able to intimidate workers who are known to favor unionization.

AFL-CIO special assistant to the president Stewart Acuff speaks to Colorado lawmakers about the Employee Free Choice Act on Tuesday during a legislative breakfast.

The Colorado Statesman Acuff was in Colorado Springs, Denver and Boulder touting the importance of the labor law revision. His Front Range tour included a legislative breakfast with a handful of Democratic state lawmakers at the Colorado Education Association Tuesday morning. During the breakfast, Acuff made an impassioned speech, stressing the importance of the EFCA to working Americans and urging those in attendance to contact Bennet and demand that he support the bill.

The EFCA is not an easy call for Bennet.

He has been targeted by both labor and business groups since arriving in Congress because both feel they can appeal to his moderate political views. Bennet — a former executive for Phil Anschutz and superintendent of Denver Public Schools who has never run for public office — has appeal to the business community but was appointed to his seat by Democratic Gov. Bill Ritter. Furthermore, Bennet, along with Colorado Sen. Mark Udall, recently joined a working group of moderate Senate Democrats that, according to some insiders, will play a role in brokering a compromise on the EFCA.

Bennet has yet to make a public statement about his position on the EFCA except to say he is studying the legislation and weighing the arguments. That hasn’t stopped labor and business interests from intensifying their lobbying campaign, however.

AFL-CIO Colorado chapter leader Mike Cerbo listens intently.

The Colorado Statesman As Acuff was in Denver asking lawmakers and labor supporters to contact Bennet in order to lobby for passage of the EFCA, a delegation from the Colorado Association of Commerce and Industry was on its way to Washington to persuade Senators Bennet and Udall to oppose the legislation.

Acuff told his Denver audience that he believes the legislation will come before Congress in seven to eight weeks and that he is hopeful Senate Democrats will be able to round up 60 votes.

“This is a close game we’re playing here,” Acuff told lawmakers Tuesday morning. “Saying (Minnesota senator-elect) Al Franken is seated, we need every Democrat to support this, and one Republican. We are working on the Republican side of things, but you can help us with the Democrats like Mark Udall and Michael Bennet who have not stated their positions.”

Most political observers agree that most voters will not view the EFCA as a campaign issue by November 2010, but that the issue will help define the nation’s newly elected officeholders. If he were to oppose the bill, Bennet might find it hard to attract union campaign donations, or he could see organized labor get behind another Democrat — possibly one Ritter passed up to appoint Bennet — in order to wage an expensive primary.

On the other hand, if he votes for the legislation, Bennet risks losing his image as a business-friendly Democrat, and he could see anti-labor forces pour millions of dollars into a 2010 GOP campaign against him.

Although state lawmakers do not have a direct vote on the EFCA issue, Rep. John Kefalas, D-Fort Collins, said he wanted to attend the breakfast with Acuff to get better information and to support labor.

“I think this legislation is very important to working families and the middle class in America,” Kefalas said after the event. “I came today because I wanted more information but also because I feel it’s important that we all reach out and see what we can do to ensure this bill is passed. Talking to people and contacting our (national) lawmakers is all part of that.”



www.TheTruthAboutEFCA.Org

http://efcanow.blogspot.com/

For more information on Employer Intimidation and Union-Busting FEAR Tactics Press Below

http://efcanow.blogspot.com/2009/02/just-say-no-to-employee-free-choice-act.html


http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blog/EFCANOW


http://efcaunionbustingclub.blogspot.com/

http://www.employeefreechoiceactnow.org

http://www.FreeChoiceActNow.Org

http://www.LaborUnionResources.Org


Tags: Stewart Acuff, Employee Free Choice Act, Employee Free Choice, EFCA, Free Choice Act, Free Choice, Labor Union, Employee Free Choice Grassroots, The Truth about EFCA, Employee Free Choice Support, AFL-CIO, Workers Rights, Labor Reform, Union Blogs, Working Families. Sphere: Related Content
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Employee Free Choice Act: AFL-CIO, SPFPA, Reject Costco Wholesale Corp., Starbucks Corp. and Whole Foods Market Inc. Alternative Plan.

 

 
Employee Free Choice Act: AFL-CIO, SPFPA, Reject Costco Wholesale Corp., Starbucks Corp. and Whole Foods Market Inc. Alternative Plan.

Yesterday Costco Wholesale Corp., Starbucks Corp. and Whole Foods Market Inc. offered an alternative to the union-backed “card-check” legislation that U.S. business groups are spending millions of dollars to defeat.

Their Proposal:

Their proposal would maintain management's right to demand a secret-ballot election and would leave out binding arbitration. The proposal would keep the third main element of card check -- toughening the penalties for companies that retaliate against workers before union elections or refuse to engage in collective bargaining. But it would also toughen penalties for union violations, and it would make it easier for businesses to call elections to try to decertify a union.

“Removing the arbitration provision” of the Employee Free Choice Act “will allow companies to stall and delay and refuse to negotiate a contract in good faith,” he said.

To address labor's concern that businesses intimidate workers before elections, it would set a fixed period in which an election must be held, limiting the delays that give employers time to exert pressure. The proposal does not specify what the time period should be.

The proposal would also provide unions equal access to workers before elections -- for instance, by allowing organizers to address workers on a lunch break in the company cafeteria just as management can.

Labor groups will be UNITED and mark my words they will oppose the alternative outlined by Starbucks, Costco and Whole Foods.



“A proposal coming from corporations, some of whom have their own history of violating workers’ rights, is simply not an alternative,” said Bill Samuel, legislative director of the AFL-CIO.

SEE Starbucks Unfair Labor Practices

“Removing the arbitration provision” of the Employee Free Choice Act “will allow companies to stall and delay and refuse to negotiate a contract in good faith,” he said.



Steve Maritas, Organizing Director for the International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America (SPFPA) Agrees.

"The Employee Free Choice Act MUST be put forward in its entirety here's why":



25 percent of employers illegally fire at least one worker for union activity during organizing campaigns.

The chances that an active union organizer or supporter will be illegally fired for union activities is one in five.

75 percent of employers hire high-dollar union busters or consultants to help them fight union organizing drives.

78 percent of employers force employees to attend one-on-one meetings against the unions with their own supervisors.

An incredible 92 percent force employees to attend mandatory closed-door meetings against the union.

51 percent of companies threaten to close their plants if the union wins an election.

1 percent of the companies actually close their plants after a successful election.

26,824 workers in fiscal year 2006 received back pay for illegal violations of workers' rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).

The percentage of cases in which employers thumb their noses at the law and do not agree to a contract after workers form a union under the current process is 44.

77 percent is the portion of the public that says strong laws protecting our workers freedom's to form unions without employer interference are important.

The portion of the public that disapproves of employer anti-union campaigns when workers try to form unions is 67 percent.

The number of U.S. workers who belong to unions is 15.7 million, or 12.1 percent

The Employee Free Choice Act is a great piece of legislation that brings the outdated, business-slanted NLRA into the new millennium. At no time does it steal the democratic principles of secret ballot. The protection comes from the fact that the employer doesn't have the say as to secret ballot. Instead, it is up the employee. This is without coercion, threats, reprisal or any recourse from the employer.

The Employee Free Choice Act does this:



It promotes voluntary majority sign-up union certification.

It protects a secret ballot option at the request of the workers.

It will expedite bargaining of the first collective bargaining agreement.

It establishes civil penalties for employers found guilty of an unfair labor practice during organizing drives.




www.TheTruthAboutEFCA.Org

http://efcanow.blogspot.com/

For more information on Employer Intimidation and Union-Busting FEAR Tactics Press Below

http://efcanow.blogspot.com/2009/02/just-say-no-to-employee-free-choice-act.html


Tags: Employee Free Choice Act, EFCA, Free Choice Act, Employee Free Choice,Costco, Starbucks, Whole Foods Market, EFCA Compromise, Free Choice, The Truth about EFCA, Employee Free Choice Bill, EFCA Information, AFL-CIO, SPFPA Sphere: Related Content
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Employee Free Choice Act: Rally Planned at the Headquarters of The Coalition for a Democratic Workplace in Washington D.C. This Week

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

March 10, 2009

The formal introduction of The Employee Free Choice Act in Congress Today the "End of Civilization will begin to disappear" for Corporate Front Groups such as The Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, My Private Ballot, Save Our Secret Ballot, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Employee Freedom Action Committee, Alliance For Worker AFW, Americans For Job Security and the public relations firm behind the Employee Free Choice Act " Losing our Secret Ballot strategy Navigators Global.


AFL-CIO



This according to Bernie Marcus, co-founder and former CEO of The Home Depot, who said during a conference call about the Employee Free Choice Act last October. Retailers who don't speak out against it "should be thrown out of their goddamn jobs."

"This is how a civilization disappears," Marcus said. "I'm sitting here as an elder statesman, and I'm watching this happen, and I don't believe it."
 

All across the nation America's Workers are holding Over 100 Grassroots Events Across the Country Urging Congress to Pass the Employee Free Choice Act.

Workers are also planning to come to D.C. Tomorrow to Tell Their Stories Directly to Their Representatives and to Testify Before the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions Committee.




This week a Coalition of some of the Biggest and Largest Labor Unions, Religious Groups and Civic Groups are Planning a Massive Rally in Support of the Employee Free Choice Act at the Headquarters of The Coalition for a Democratic Workplace a Corporate Front Group made up of over 500 members who are opposing the Employee Free Choice Act.





Employee Free Choice Act: Rally Planned at the Headquarters of The Coalition for a Democratic Workplace in Washington D.C. This Week

The Time and Date of the Rally will be Announced Shortly.

Coalition for a Democratic Workplace
901 7th Street NW, 2nd Floor
Washington, DC 20001(202) 580-7289


In Other News:



Hundreds Demonstrate at Chamber of Commerce, Industry Trade Groups To Expose Massive Anti-Worker Lobbying

By Kate Thomas on March 9, 2009 5:23 PM

Tell Corporate CEOs: Stop Standing in the Way of an Economy That Works for Everyone

We've just returned from Lafayette Park - right across the street from both The White House and the Chamber of Commerce - where hundreds of workers from across the country joined with labor, religious and community leaders to stage one amazing rally.

After five separate actions in front of places like Burger King, Bank of America, and the headquarters for the hotel and restaurant trade association, we coalesced together near the Chamber of Commerce, where we participated in some crowd-pleasing skits, heard stories from members along with a brief word from SEIU President Andy Stern.

Why try to get the attention of these organizations? We took a look at their lobbying disclosures and found that the Chamber of Commerce and the leading associations for the restaurant, hotel, manufacturing, retail, and financial industries spent a combined $138.4 million on federal lobbying last year, hired 44 lobbying firms, and used at least 34 different front groups to push their agenda.

And, for the Chamber specifically, in the last ten years, they've spent $375 million to advance the interests of big business over those of small businesses and working families.

"So they might be a big and mighty lobbying machine--but guess what, when I asked their top officer Tom Donohue to debate me on employee free choice - he declined," said Andy Stern during the event. "It's not surprising they don't want to face us in public... how could they defend what they're doing?"

While the median hourly wage for workers in most industries is at or below the federal poverty line for a family of four, a look at 2007 CEO pay at leading firms in the trade groups found executive compensation ranging from $2 million up to $67 million. All opposed the Employee Free Choice Act, which is supported by 73 percent of Americans according to national surveys, and most also fought minimum wage increases and pushed restrictions on family and medical leave.

Tomorrow, the workers that participated in today's events (including more than 300 SEIU grassroots member lobbyists) have another full, exciting day ahead of them: discuss the importance of the Employee Free Choice Act. They're going meet with their Senators and Representatives to share their stories about being fired, intimidated, and harassed by their employers for trying to form a union.

For More Information on EFCA please visit our websites and blog



www.TheTruthAboutEFCA.Org

http://www.employeefreechoiceactnow.org

http://efcanow.blogspot.com/

http://efcaunionbustingclub.blogspot.com/

http://www.FreeChoiceActNow.Org

http://www.LaborUnionResources.Org

For more information on Employer Intimidation and Union-Busting FEAR Tactics Press Below

http://efcanow.blogspot.com/2009/02/just-say-no-to-employee-free-choice-act.html


Tags: Employee Free Choice Act, Free Choice Act, EFCA, Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, My Private Ballot,Chamber of Commerce,Navigators Global,Labor Union, Unions, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Employee Freedom Action Committee, Alliance For Worker AFW, Americans For Job Security, Secret Ballot, Card Check, SEIU. AFL-CIO, USW, Change to Win, UAW Teamsters, Sphere: Related Content
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Despite the Lies by Corporate Front Groups Like The Coalition for a Democratic Workplace Support is Growing For The Employee Free Choice Act

 

Despite the Lies by Corporate Front Groups Like The Coalition for a Democratic Workplace Support is Growing For The Employee Free Choice Act

Rally in Pittsburgh, Roundtable in Madison and More Action on Employee Free Choice

By Seth Michaels, Feb 20, 2009

This week, state and local unions around the country mobilized to pass the Employee Free Choice Act to restore the freedom to form unions and bargain and make the economy work for everyone.

In Pennsylvania, workers gathered in Pittsburgh to support the Employee Free Choice Act and highlight a new report that shows how much workers in each state would stand to gain in wages if the act passed and how more workers could form unions. In Pennsylvania, an increase in the rate of union membership of just 5 percent would increase total wages by $852 million.

Economist Mark Price spoke at the Pittsburgh rally, where he pointed out that restoring bargaining power to workers was essential to creating a balance between workers and corporations and rebuilding the middle class. During the midcentury expansion of the U.S. economy, Price said, strong levels of union membership ensured that "when workers were more productive," their work generated more wealth, that wealth would show up in their paychecks.

The Pittsburgh rally also featured workers like Keli Vereb, a member of United Steelworkers (USW) Local 1408, who talked about what union membership has meant to her family: a fair wage, good benefits and the opportunity to send her daughter to college. 

In Madison, Wis., U.S. Rep. Tammy Baldwin was the featured speaker at a roundtable event in support of the Employee Free Choice Act organized by the South Central Federation of Labor. Ryan Wolfe, a member of Sheet Metal Workers (SMWIA) Local 565 in Madison, was among union members taking part. He said a seat at the bargaining table is vital to allowing workers a better life and a fair share of the economy: 

Every employee should have the right to do what I have done. Through my union I have been able to negotiate with my employer for things that have made my family better off. The Employee Free Choice Act will extend that opportunity to more Wisconsin workers.

(You can watch streaming video or listen to audio of the entire event at Wisconsin Eye TV.) 

In Maine, a rally for the Employee Free Choice Act featured U.S. Rep. Mike Michaud as well as leaders from the state House and Senate. Michaud was a 30-year paper mill worker before winning his seat and currently is a member of USW Local 4-00037. 

At a Wednesday event in Lincoln, Neb., state federaton President Ken Mass said the Employee Free Choice Act would "restore the broken link between productivity and pay." Nebraska unions members have begun a letter-writing campaign to their state's U.S. senators in support of the Employee Free Choice Act.

In Virginia, the state AFL-CIO legislative conference focused on the Employee Free Choice Act, and union members wrote letters to their senators as well urging them to support the Employee Free Choice Act.

Workers and their allies also held rallies in support of the Employee Free Choice Act in Chicago; Montana; Raleigh, N.C.; and Sacramento, Calif.

Union members also are working hard to raise funds for the Turn Around America Media Fund, to counteract the multimillion-dollar anti-worker disinformation campaign run by corporate front groups. State federations in Nevada, North Carolina and Minnesota all successfully raised funds this week. You can donate here.

For More Information on EFCA please visit our websites and blog  

http://www.employeefreechoiceactnow.org  

http://efcanow.blogspot.com/  

http://efcaunionbustingclub.blogspot.com/  

http://www.FreeChoiceActNow.Org  

http://www.LaborUnionResources.Org

Tags: The Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, Employee Free Choice Act, Free Choice Act, Employee Free Choice Act News, EFCA, Free Choice Act Now, Employee Free Choice Act Blogs, Union Busting, Union Avoidance, Labor Unions, Labor Union News, Unions, AFL-CIO, Corporate Front Groups

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

New Report Reveals Why GOP Hates Unions: They Raise Wages, Boost Economy

New Report Reveals Why GOP Hates Unions: They Raise Wages, Boost Economy

Art Levine
Contributing editor of The Washington Monthly

Posted February 19, 2009

The Hoover-like GOP has been working overtime to oppose President Obama's stimulus package while hoping he fails. Meanwhile, a report released yesterday by the Center for American Progress Action Fund essentially underscores the real reasons Republicans and the business community have taken another equally short-sighted economic stance: fighting workers' right to organize. As Unions Are Good For the American Economy points out with irrefutable statistics, unionization raises wages and boosts the economy because it puts more money in the pockets of American workers.

(The report itself, of course, doesn't directly accuse the GOP and corporate interests of opposing economic growth and recovery, but reading its measured analysis of the economic benefit of unions leads to the inescapable conclusion that anti-union business leaders have a misguided zeal for low wages at all cost -- regardless of the impact on their own workers, their firms' productivity, their own long-term profits or the broader economy.)

In a conference call with reporters to discuss the report, former Labor Secretary Robert Reich observed: "One reason we're in the crisis we're in is because consumers have run out of money....If they can't borrow anymore, and they have to rely on sinking wages, the entire economy is in trouble, because there's not enough demand out there." Reich added, "The point of the Employee Free Choice Act is to end intimidation and allow workers to join unions as they have a right to do. Workers want to be in unions [nearly 60% say they'd join if they could], and if they did have unions, they'd have higher wages and benefits. And if they had higher wags and benefits, they'd have the purchasing power to buy more goods and services."

In fact, the relative stagnation of wages over the last few decades -- due in large part to effective unionbusting aimed at keeping labor costs low -- helped bring on the economic meltdown because too many low-income workers were suckered into mortgages they really couldn't afford. Those mortgages were in turn bundled into the "toxic assets" -- those various nearly-worthless investment vehicles -- that have weakened the world's financial systems and brought on our free-fall recession. As Daily Kos diarist Trapper John reported last year, "AFL-CIO Associate General Counsel Damon Silvers lays out how the decline in unionization which began in the mid-Seventies led to the burst of the sub-prime bubble, and ultimately to today's recession. And he wrote it way back in April."

In contrast, this new Center for American Progress report points out, if unionization rates today were the same as they were in 1983, an additional $49 billion could be pumped into the economy by workers represented by unions. As the report co-authored by David Madland and Karla Walter says, "In 1983, 23.3 percent of American workers were either members of a union or represented by a union at their workplace. By 2008, that portion declined to 13.7 percent." And, as Reich and the report noted, "Workers in unions earn 30% higher than non-union workers."

As Beth Shulman, author of The Betrayal of Work, observed during the conference call: "A union job transforms a low-wage job into a good job" -- and a pathway to the middle-class. And those workers will be able come into showrooms, real estate offices, auto dealerships and stores across America to start buying again and paying down-payments for a home. Shulman quoted a grocery store worker who joined a union, Linda, telling her, "For the first time, I can dream for my child," and who started putting away money for her child's college education. "Having unionization gives people a stake in the American dream," Shulman said.

But , as usual, big businesses and the GOP have taken a short-term, greedy look at their economic self-interest and determined they must fight the Employee Free Choice Act with all the weapons at their disposal. These include $200 million worth of smear ads , lobbying and misleading talking points; they're claiming (falsely) that it takes away the secret ballot and will wreck the economy.



Yet, as Shulman says, "The business community knows the basic facts that are in this report: when workers have unions, they have better wages, they have better benefits, they have a voice in the workplace, so it's not surprising they would take a hard line with this. This [bill] is important to ensure a road to the middle class and a right to organize." She's confident that the goals of the legislation will trump corporate special interests and right-wing ideology: "Clearly, it will get passed, because it's in the interest of working America."

And as Walter and other pro-union advocates point out, a level playing field for union organizing helps the economy. The higher wages paid by unions boosts productivity, reduce turnover and can even improve profits. Partially unionized Cosco, she says, has nearly 40% more in labor costs than its sister company, Sam's Club, but has almost double the per-employee profit margin. "They invested in the jobs and lowered turnover," she observes.

In fact, even the Heritage Foundation's much-hyped index of "economic freedom" in countries around the world pointed to economies with the highest rates of unionization in the workforce.

As for the right-wing's favorite whipping boys, the auto industry and the UAW, Walter and other experts say the blame should fall on the executives' poor manufacturing decisions -- not the 10 percent of a car's cost made up by labor costs. And, despite the demonization of the UAW, the American auto-industry workers' wages are now roughly comparable to those in non-unionized Japanese factories, but it's the added costs of health care and pensions for union retirees over the decades that have actually raised costs. In addition, as the latest restructuring and cost-cutting plans show, the UAW has been willing to compromise -- after giving up important gains in negotiations in earlier years.

The important new report shows that the original goal of the UAW -- helping their workers achieve a decent, middle-class standard of living while working in factories -- could also help today's low-paid workers, especially in the growing service and health-care sectors, boost their incomes if they had the right to join a union. As the AFL-CIO Now blog reports:

The report also provides a state-by-state analysis of increased union membership on wages. An increase in the rate of union membership of just 5 percent would increase total wages by $176 million in Nebraska, $503 million in Wisconsin and $852 million in Pennsylvania.

These wages would be spread across the entire labor market.

"The essence of what labor unions do--give workers a stronger voice so that they can get a fair share of the economic growth they help create--is and has always been important to making the economy work for all Americans. And unions only become more important as the economy worsens.

"One of the primary reasons why our current recession endures is that workers do not have the purchasing power they need to drive our economy...what is sustainable is an economy where workers are adequately rewarded and have the income they need to purchase goods. This is where unions come in."

Walter and Madland point to the disconnect between productivity and wages as a major factor in our economic crisis. Indeed, if wages had kept pace with productivity increases, rather than falling behind as they have in recent decades, average wages would be 42.7 percent higher. That's a sizable share of the economy that workers have lost, undermining consumer purchasing power and economic security--which, in turn, hurt the nation's entire economy in a vicious downward spiral.

That's why protecting union rights becomes so critical to economic recovery. As Karla Walter summed up her research, "The Employee Free Choice Act is not only important because it makes it harder for anti-union companies to harass workers, it boosts unionization rates, and improves millions of Americans' economic standing, providing families of those with union jobs a path to the middle class and pumping billions into the American economy every year."

At the heart of all this is a drive for fairness and a level playing field for workers -- the right to bargain for decent pay and benefits. As Stewart Acuff, the special assistant to the president of the AFL-CIO, says caustically, "If the bosses can bargain with their boards of directors for their $200 million salaries and $10 million bonuses while they were screwing up their companies, workers ought to be able to bargain for their kids' health care and wages they can count on."

For More Information on EFCA please visit our website and blog

http://www.employeefreechoiceactnow.org

http://efcanow.blogspot.com

http://www.FreeChoiceActNow.Org

http://www.LaborUnionResources.Org

http://images2.americanprogress.org/CAPAF/2009/02/US_EFCA.pdf

Tags: Employee Free Choice Act, EFCA, GOP, Republicans, Corporate Front Groups,The Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, Heritage Foundation, AFL-CIO, Union Organizing, unions, Workers Rights, Labor Unions, Center for American Progress

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »